I’m mixed. In one way, he is a good owner to his team and willing try and even attempted to spend (see Friedman, Judge, and Ozuna). I do get irritated with his comments on attendance during high times like playoff games. I do not like how he is not more active in the community unlike Vinik and the Glazers.
Do I think baseball would survive without him In the Bay Area? Yes, due to the market size. Do I think it would do as well? No.
Stu is a business man but not cold or distant. He is willing to talk to any fan and take criticism. For that I respect him and admire his business tactics.
Stu is just really hard to get behind because he is a businessman and is in the business of building a thriving business, which happens to play baseball. He took a franchise and nearly increased its value by 1 billion dollars. During that time he has only watched a perennial loser because the third best team in baseball since ‘08 and the 4th best team since ‘20. For all his flaws, he is good. Period.
I’m mixed. In one way, he is a good owner to his team and willing try and even attempted to spend (see Friedman, Judge, and Ozuna). I do get irritated with his comments on attendance during high times like playoff games. I do not like how he is not more active in the community unlike Vinik and the Glazers.
Do I think baseball would survive without him In the Bay Area? Yes, due to the market size. Do I think it would do as well? No.
Stu is a business man but not cold or distant. He is willing to talk to any fan and take criticism. For that I respect him and admire his business tactics.
Stu is just really hard to get behind because he is a businessman and is in the business of building a thriving business, which happens to play baseball. He took a franchise and nearly increased its value by 1 billion dollars. During that time he has only watched a perennial loser because the third best team in baseball since ‘08 and the 4th best team since ‘20. For all his flaws, he is good. Period.